"If you have the best money can buy, it appears to me you can get away with a lot more. It's far more difficult to convict somebody," he said Monday. "I believe the government does a better job of protecting the rights of the affluent ... than it does for the normal citizens in this country."

As the pace of jury selection at Terry Nichols' trial quickened, potential jurors in the second Oklahoma City bombing trial provided mixed reviews of the American justice system. Distrust for the nation's justice system is growing. Lawyer controlled legislatures are ineffective in drafting laws that govern American citizens seeking protections and immunities for themselves.
See lawyers immunity law. Code of Alabama, 1975, Section 6-5-570.

In Alabama for instance, the lawyer controlled legislature passed an Act 95-648, Disclosure of Campaign Contributions, that directs the Alabama Supreme Court to draft rules to implement provisions for disclosure of contributions to judicial campaigns and the mandatory recusal of judges in certain events. The lawyer controlled legislature could not pass a law that stool upon face value; the lawyer controlled legislature granted the judicial branch the right to draft rules that defined the statute. There exist, in Alabama, a judicial rule committee for every law passed by the legislature and some judicial rule committees that the legislature is unaware.

According to J. Mark White, a Birmingham, Alabama lawyer and chairman of the Alabama Supreme Court's Standing Committee on Rules of Conduct and Canons of Judicial Ethics, Act 95-648, contains substantial constitutional issues. The committee, comprised of experienced lawyers and judges, spent many hours trying to develop rules to enforce the statute.

White said, "The statute requires filing of certificates of disclosures within time frames inconsistent with existing rules and statutes." Lawyer judges do not like to be told to change their rules.
.
Alabama has an "Alabama Law Institute" that specializes in what issues need to be addressed by the state legislature, like the legislature is incapable of deciding issues on its own.

(a) The board of commissioners of the Alabama state bar may organize, create and establish a state law institute to be known as the Alabama Law Institute as an official advisory law revision and law reform agency of the state of Alabama.

(b) The institute shall have such members, officers and committees as the board of commissioners of the Alabama state bar may direct.

(c) The governing body of the institute shall be a council composed of ex officio members and elected members as follows: Notice all members are lawyers.

1. One justice of the supreme court of Alabama, selected by the justices thereof.
2. One judge of the court of civil appeals of Alabama, selected by the judges thereof.
3. One judge of the court of criminal appeals of Alabama, selected by the judges thereof.
4. One circuit court judge, selected by the association of circuit court judges.
5. One federal judge residing in Alabama, selected by the federal judges residing in Alabama.
6. The attorney general of the state of Alabama.
7. The legal advisor to the governor of Alabama.
8. The chairman of the judiciary committees of the senate and house of representatives, or any attorney appointed by either of them who is a member of the judiciary committee.
9. The president and secretary of the Alabama state bar.
10. The chairman of the junior bar section of the Alabama state bar.
11. The dean of the University of Alabama School of Law.
12. The dean of the Cumberland School of Law of Samford University.
13. The dean of each privately operated law school in the state of Alabama whose graduates are admitted as candidates for examination and admission to the Alabama state bar.
14. The dean of the Miles College Law School.
15. The president and secretary of the Alabama Law Institute.
16. The attorney members of the legislative council of Alabama, together with the secretary of the legislative council.
17. Not less than three nor more than six attorney members appointed by the governor of Alabama for terms to run concurrently with the term of the governor.
18. The director of the continuing legal education program sponsored by the Alabama state bar, the University of Alabama Law School and the Cumberland School of Law of Samford University.
19. All elected members of the American Law Institute who reside in Alabama.
    
    

Alabama Law Institute claims to be an official advisory law revision and law reform agency of the state of Alabama. However, please note the following.

The Alabama Uniform Guardianship and Protective Proceedings Act, Code of Alabama, 1975, Section 26-2A-1, is the product of the Alabama Law Institute and the work of a committee appointed by the Alabama Law Institute, which included attorneys, probate judges, law teachers and a representative of the Alabama department of pensions and security. The chapter embodies separate systems of guardianship to protect persons of minors and persons otherwise incapacitated.

The chapter is designated a "Uniform" Act for the purpose of aiding courts and other individuals, in construing this chapter, to find similar statutes in other states and court decisions construing those statutes in developing a general body of law to carry out the purpose of this and similar acts. The general policy supporting "uniformity" is that uniformity of these acts among the various enacting states will enhance the probability that the purposes of these acts will be achieved in our mobile society. In other words to enhance the purposes of the lawyers that control the state and its legislature.

The Separation of Powers Doctrine embodied in our Constitutions dictates that the three branches of government remain separate. Constitution of Alabama, 1901, Article III. Even a casual study of the legal process in Alabama shows that the separation of government has been abdicated. The above article constitutes only a small portion of the constitutional violations perpetrated upon the citizens of Alabama by the firmly entrenched legal monopoly. A clandestine monopoly actively engaged in the business of influence and corruption of state government.

The Judicial Branch of government is actively engaged in the business of drafting laws and rules of court, without an important and legal faction of the people - the Pro Se advocate.