Name Candith Jones
Address 2571 Candler Road, J14
City Decatur
State Georgia
Zipcode 30032
Phone 404-244-0322
 
 


"THE ENIGMA" or "THE CONSPIRACY"
Born and raised in Harlem U.S.A., a former Marine, Civil Rights Activist now Political Prisoner, I am a man that has been kidnaped and held hostage indefinitely by the New York City Police Department, Queens District Attorney Office and the New York State Department of Correctional Services.

Kevin Jackson at age 25 founded a non-profit organization in 1988. The organizations only concerns were developing and securing legitimate employment for minorities in the construction industry. Kevin was responsible for placing thousands of people to work from his organization, at any given time, he had over 200 active members employed all grossing an average of 50-75K yearly.

He has poured over $100 Million back into Black and Latino Communities within a 7 year span prior to his warrantless arrest, which was procured in April 1995 due to a Fabricated Case?

Kevin was arrested, indicted and convicted, and almost eight years later sentenced to two life terms for an alleged homicide that never was established at trial.

In criminal law, the Latin term Corpus Delicti means, "body of the crime". It is the objective proof that a crime has been committed. It is sometimes thought of, mistakenly, as the body of the victim but correctly understood a corpus delicti in a murder prosecution is a "Prima Facie showing that the alleged victim met death by a criminal agency". Corpus Delicti applies to every crime.

In order for the state to introduce a confession or convict the accused, it must first prove a corpus delicti. The elements of which are; first, the occurrence of the specific kind of injury or loss (as in homicide, a person deceased); and secondly, somebody's criminality in contrast to mere accident or suicide) as the source of the loss. These two together involve the commission of a crime by someone.

To the contrary, the case at bar, relating to the only medical evidence adduced at trial, i.e. an Uncertified Photostat copy of the EMS/hospital records, conspicuously had no proper foundation laid, which, by law is "strictly inadmissible hearsay".

According to submitted documents, on November 1, 1989 at approximately 10:00 A.M., the alleged victim's body was claimed to have been recovered by the NYC Fire Department, NYC Police Department and Emergency Medical Services. All in that order MINUTES after the alleged shooting.

The victim was then immediately thereafter transported to Jamaica Hospital, however, the Medical Doctor who allegedly claimed to have "pronounced [the alleged victim] expired", had no license to practice medicine in the State of New York, leaving his competency questionable and a prima facie case demonstrating negligence.

In any event, no medical expert or medical examiner (coroner) testified and neither autopsy report nor death certificate were introduced into evidence at trial concerning said matter.

The "evidence in chief" which was, again improperly admitted at trial, was a copied fraudulent 911 tape. None of the participants in the 911 call (alleged 911 caller or 911 operator) who was available to testify was ever called to testify at hearing or trial to attest to the authenticity of this adulterated sound recording.

In addition, this last minute, haphazard, doctored tape, was suddenly produced for the first time on the eve of trial; trial by ambush with an unorthodox procedure. A 7 year chain of custody gap (remains unfilled) and without a sealed evidence bag, which normally preserves the accuracy and integrity of any and all "authentic evidence" that is susceptible to being replaced or altered.

On this same alleged 911 call to the 911 central dispatch center concerning said incident, an ambulance was requested to come to the crime scene for alleged victim, only, in reality, HOURS later (as opposed to "minutes" as previously stated) after the alleged shooting, which is absolutely scandalous.

The most damaging portions on this corrupt 911 tape states the following:

911 caller: "Yeah, Kevin Jackson shot rich, word to God. He is lying on the ground right there, in the head".

911 Operator: "Sir, is this on the expressway or what?"

911 caller: "Word to God, I seen Kevin Jackson's car pull off.".

911 Operator: Sir, can I have the telephone number your calling from?

As you can see, it's self-evident that there is no acknowledgment or no natural inquiry from the alleged 911 operator to the alleged caller pertaining to any description of the alleged perpetrator and/or alleged car which would be normal protocol for any trained police 911 operator. This clearly indicates that these two statements were "inserted" just to captivate the audience; in this case the jury.

Consequently, the contents ("God's" name was used in vain) of this untrustworthy and unreliable 911 call falls under "classic prejudicial hearsay", a violation under the sixth amendment of the constitution. The accused in a criminal prosecution is entitled "to be confronted with the witnesses against him, and to hear and cross-examine all witnesses against him." Additionally, this manufactured 911 tape was also "immaterial" trial evidence, all based upon the fact that the alleged 911 caller did not observe the alleged event.

Thus, It served no probative value except to prejudice Kevin at trial and successfully contaminate the minds of the jurors.

Assuming arguendo, that this alleged 911 call existed back on November 1, 1989, the #1 question is why did it take 5 ½ years to manifest an arrest and then two more years to commence trial.

Moreover, there was testimony from a four-time convicted felon who for some apparent reason never felt compelled to come forward until he was facing a life sentence himself. He conveniently made a "Cooperation Agreement" with the Queens District Attorneys office subsequently to have his robbery and burglary charges dismissed.

In exchange, this "incredible uncorroborated witness" testified that Kevin made an alleged oral confession more Inherent unreliable hearsay.

Sometime in November of 1989 on the telephone while this same witness was spending time in jail "absent independent corroboration" (Corpus Delicti) attesting to the truth of the matter and proving that the alleged victim is even deceased. (failed the first prong test). nevertheless, a homicide was committed (failed the second prong test) which is mandatory as a matter of law.

The sole purpose and demands of the statute which declares that a confession standing alone is not sufficient to warrant a conviction requiring corroboration by independent evidence of the corpus delicti apart from the defendant's admission or confession is to obviate the danger that a person may be convicted for a confessed crime. When there was in fact no such crime committed by anyone (emphasis added). Please note, it is a strong possibility that the alleged decedent in this case may still be alive.

Most recently, the New York State Department of Correctional Services has conspired with others in depriving Kevin adequate, effective and meaningful access to the Law Library, ultimately to the courts.

In essence, these "monstrous and blatant" violations are denials of fundamental Civil Rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution, done under color of state law, separate but equal protection and due process of law which are all entrusted under the Fourteenth Amendment.

In conclusion, Kevin Jackson is now desperately seeking judicial intervention and legal assistance so he can have a full and fair opportunity to prove his innocence, which is paramount to this on-going cover-up!

"The Maxim of the law is that it is better that ninety-nine offenders should escape, than that one innocent man should be condemned."

Please Help!!

Send all inquires to [email protected]


 
   More horror Stories of American Injustice