Dorrel G Holmes' Story
U.S. House of Representatives.
Hon. Felix Grucci, Hon. Steve Israel, Hon. Pete King, Hon. Carolyn Mc McCarthy, Hon. Gary Ackerman, Hon. Gregory Meeks, Hon. Joseph Crowley, Hon. Jerrold Nadler, Hon. Anthony David Weiner, Hon. Edolphus Towns, Hon. Major Owens, Hon. Nydia Velasquez, Hon. Vito Fossella, Hon. Carolyn Maloney, Hon. Charles Rangel, Hon. Jose Serano, Hon. Eliot Engle, Hon. Nita Lowey, Hon. Sue Kelly, Hon. Benjamin Gilman, Hon. Michael Mc Nulty, Hon. John Sweeney, Hon. Sherwood Boehlert, Hon. John Mc Hugh, Hon. James Walsh, Hon. Maurice Hinchey, Hon. Thomas Reynolds, Hon. Louise Mc Intosh Slaughter, Hon. John La Face, Hon. Jack Quinn, Hon. Amory Houghton.
Casework Assistance.
January 21, 2001
Dorrel G Holmes
PO Box 300271
Jamaica NY 11430
[email protected]
In the matter of the complaint of Dorrel Holmes
RE: Invisible crimes
Dear Sir/Madam,
Conspiracy, counterfeit, fraud, forgery, alteration and falsification of Court records, and witness tampering is illegal, under Federal and State laws.
Beginning at least as early as October 17, 1990, for the purpose of fixing Court cases, an organized group, John Doe, Emanuel Haber, and others, did obstruct the due administration of Justice, and did conduct the affairs of the Queens County Civil Court (housing) through a pattern of racketeering, by means of conspiracy, counterfeit, fraud, forgery, alteration and falsification of the Court records.
As a result, numerous pending Court cases have disappeared from the Court calendar, the record is corrupt, and complainant is injured.
Complainant, a victim of and witness to the schemes, is barred from reporting them through acts including, but not limited to, assault intimidation, threat of force, threat of arrest, deception, diversion, and verbal abuse, by members of the New York City Police Department, the Queens County District Attorney, and other governmental agencies.
Through their failure to take corrective action, and through their affirmative acts of support for criminals, they have contributed to an aura of domination by criminal elements.
Today the schemes continue in full view, the criminals are still at large, my life is at risk, and the Queens County Civil Court remains a captive enterprise.
I am taking this action to bring to your attention, this critical matter that warrants an investigation by your office, and requests your assistance in reporting the crimes perpetrated against me, and to be treated like other victims who have been similarly situated.
Your immediate attention will be highly appreciated.
AFFIRMATION
Dorrel Holmes for his complaint, makes the following affirmation under the penalty of perjury, and state:
1.Complainant Dorrel Holmes, a resident of the State of New York is Black, poor, a Jamaican national, and victim of the schemes described in this complaint. Complainant believes, because of his race, class, and ethnicity among other things, he is treated differently.
The Group:
2.John Doe, appears to be an Attorney. During the period covered by this complaint, he represented the law firm COHEN HURKIN EHERENFELD PROMERANTZ AND TENENBAUM, a corporation incorporated under the laws of The State Of New York, having an office at 282 Atlantic Avenue Brooklyn New York 11201. During the course of numerous Court proceedings, he did not identify himself by name or any other means. He was always addressed as counselor never by name. His signature which appears on the documents bearing the index numbers L&T 85725/90, and L&T 93165/90 is not legible. His name is not printed below his signature, as required by law. A notice of appearance was not filed with the Court as required by law.
3.Emanuel Haber, an employee of the State of New York, was at all times relevant, a hearing officer officer assigned to the Queens County Civil Court of The City of New York(housing). He was responsible for adjudicating cases referred to the Court for disposition, enforce State and local laws, including those regulating housing maintenance standards, and to process eviction proceedings.
4.Whenever this complaint refers to any act deed or transaction of an entity, it means that the entity engaged in the act, deed, or transaction, by or through it's officers, directors, employees, agents, or other representatives, while they were actively engaged in the management, direction, control, or transaction of it's business or affairs.
5.Various others not named herein have participated as co-conspirators in the violations alleged in this complaint and have performed acts and made statements to further the conspiracies.
THE PATTERN OF RACKETEERING
(A) October 17, 1990 events:
6.The proceeding L&T 85725/90 was assigned to Emanuel Haber. On October 17, 1990, Emanuel Haber did not preside over a trial/hearing in the matter.
7.Complainant is entitled to a trial/hearing.
8.By reason of the fact[s] described in paragraph 6 above, On October 17, 1990, Emanuel Haber, as hearing officer of the Civil Court of the City of New York acting under the color of State law;
a. did not perform duties imposed by law, and did obstruct the due administration of justice, in violation of 18 USC @ 1503, and did
b. conspire to deprive complainant of rights protected and guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of the United States, in violation of 18 USC @ 242.
9.The "SO ORDERED" court seal which appears on the document, dated October 17, 1990, and bearing the index number L&T 85725/90 is a fake. The document, a part of the Court record is made a part of this complaint.
10.By reason of the fact[s] described in paragraph 9 above, upon information and belief, John Doe did counterfeit, or have the "SO ORDERED" Court seal counterfeited on the document, in violation of 18 USC @ 505.
11.The annexed document, bearing the index number, L&T 85725/90, and dated October 17, 1990, was authored by John Doe. John Doe signed Emanuel Haber's signature "so ordering" the document.
12.By reason of the fact[s] described in paragraph 11 above, John Doe did forge Emanuel Haber's signature so ordering the document, in violation of 18 USC @ 1506.
13.John Doe filed the document with the Court.
14.By reason of the fact[s] described in paragraph 13 above, John Doe did knowingly file a false instrument with the Court, in violation of 18 USC @ 505.
15. The Court record, petition L&T 85725/90 is stamped "SETTLED AND DISCONTINUED" The document is made a part of this complaint.
16.By reason of the fact[s] described in paragraph 15 above, the Court altered the document in violation of 18 USC @ 1506.
17.The Court's computer indicate a settlement and disposition of the proceeding.
18.By reason of the fact[s] described in paragraph 17 above, the Court accessed it's computer and made false entries, in violation of 18 USC @ 1506.
19.By reason of the fact[s] described in paragraph 6 through 18 above, Emanuel Haber as hearing officer of the Civil Court of the City of New York acting under the color of State law, along with John Doe, and others did;
a. conspire to interfere with complainant's civil rights in violation of 42 USC @ 1985(2)
b. conspire to interfere with complainant's civil rights in violation of 42 USC @ 1985(3)
(B)December 19, 1990 events:
20.The proceeding L&T 85725/90, disguised as L&T 93165/90 was assigned to Emanuel Haber. On December 19, 1990 Emanuel Haber did not preside over a trial/hearing in the matter.
21.Complainant is entitled to a trial/hearing.
22.By reason of the fact[s] described in paragraphs 20 and 21, above, on December 19, 1990 Emanuel Haber as hearing officer of the Civil Court of the City of New York acting under the color of State law;
a. did not perform duties imposed by law, and did obstruct the due administration of justice, in violation of 18 USC @ 1503, and did
b. conspire to deprive complainant of rights protected and guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of the United States, in violation of 18 USC @ 242.
23.The "SO ORDERED" court seal which appears on the document, dated December 19, 1990, and bearing the index number L&T 93165/90 is a fake. The document, a part of the Court record is made a part of this complaint.
24.By reason of the fact[s] described in paragraph 23 above, upon information and belief, John Doe did counterfeit, or have the "SO ORDERED" Court seal counterfeited on the document, in violation of 18 USC @ 505.
25.The annexed document, bearing the index number, L&T 93165/90, and dated December 19, 1990, was authored by John Doe. John Doe signed Emanuel Haber's signature "so ordering" the document.
26.By reason of the fact[s] described in paragraph 25 above, John Doe did forge Emanuel Haber's signature so ordering the document, in violation of 18 USC @ 1506.
27.John Doe filed the document with the Court.
28.By reason of the fact[s] described in paragraph 27 above, John Doe did knowingly file a false instrument with the Court, in violation of 18 USC @ 505.
29.Emanuel Haber's initials, "EH", appears on the document.
30.By reason of the fact[s] described in paragraph 29 above,
Emanuel Haber, as hearing officer of the Civil Court of the City of New York acting under the color of State law;
a. altered the document in violation of 18 USC @ 1506, and did,
b. not as soon as possible make John Doe's illegal acts known to some other person in law enforcement, in violation of 18 USC @ 4
31.The Court's computer indicate a trial/hearing presided over by Emanuel Haber.
32.By reason of the fact[s] described in paragraph 31 above, the Court did:
a. access it's computer and made false entries, in violation of 18 USC @ 1506, and did,
b. conspire to interfere with complainant's civil rights in violation of 42 USC @ 1985(2)
c. conspire to interfere with complainant's civil rights in violation of 42 USC @ 1985(3)
33.By reason of the foregoing, beginning at least as early as October 17, 1990, an organized group, John Doe, Emanuel Haber, and others, for the purpose of fixing Court cases, entered into and engaged in schemes, and did:
a. conspire to, and conduct the affairs of the Queens County Civil Court (housing) through a pattern of racketeering, in violation of the RICO Act 18 USC @ 1961 through 1968 and did,
b. conspire to interfere with complainant's civil rights in violation of 42 USC @ 1985(2)
c. conspire to interfere with complainant's civil rights in violation of 42 USC @ 1985(3)
34.Since fraud, forgery, counterfeit, conspiracy, alteration, and falsification of Court records, is illegal, and the responsibility of of law enforcement to investigate and prosecute the criminals.
35.On numerous occasions in mid 1997 complainant contacted the 102 Precinct to report the above. Complainant was ignored by the Intake clerk.
36.Complainant contacted the Desk Sergeant, informed him of John Doe's criminal conduct, submitted the fraudulent document dated October 17, 1990 and bearing the index number number L&T 77824/90.
37.Complainant was verbally abused, referred to the psyche ward of the Jamaica Hospital, and chased from the precinct.
38.By reason of the fact[s] described in paragraph 37 above, desk sergeant John Doe did
a. engage in conduct that did prevent complainant's testimony in an official proceeding in violation of 18 USC @ 1512(b),(1) and did
b. conspire to interfere with complainant's civil rights in violation of 42 USC @ 1985(2)
c. conspire to interfere with complainant's civil rights in violation of 42 USC @ 1985(3)
39.Police Officer Jane Doe instructed complainant that complainant could not file charges against John Doe, and that only Emanuel Haber could, since it was Emanuel Haber's signature that was forged.
40.By reason of the fact[s] described in paragraph 39 above, Police Officer Jane Doe did engage in misleading conduct toward complainant with the intent to influence, delay and prevent complainant's testimony in an official proceeding in violation of 18 USC @ 1512(b),(1)
41.Upon hearing Desk Sergeant John Doe's instructions, with protruding chest, and arms recessed, Police Officer John Doe walked menacingly into complainant forcing complainant to retreat backwards exiting the Precinct.
42.By reason of the fact[s] described in paragraph 41 above, Police Officer John Doe did:
a. use intimidation, and the threat of physical force to prevent complainant's testimony in an official proceeding in violation of 18 USC @ 1512(b),(1)
b. conspire to interfere with complainant's civil rights in violation of 42 USC @ 1985(2)
c. conspire to interfere with complainant's civil rights in violation of 42 USC @ 1985(2)
43.Complainant contacted Assistant District Attorney, Vincent Carroll who at the time, was Chief of the Integrity Bureau of the Queens County District Attorney. Mr. Carroll confirmed the scam's existence, however he informed complainant that the Queens County District Attorney was without jurisdiction, and the matter should be reported to the Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts since John Doe is an attorney, even though John Doe's true identity is unknown.
44.By reason of the fact[s] described in paragraph 43 above, Vincent Carroll as Assistant District attorney acting under the color of State law; did
a. engage in misleading conduct toward complainant with the intent to prevent complainant's testimony in an official proceeding in violation of 18 USC @ 1512(b),(1) and did
b. not perform duties imposed by law, and did obstruct the due administration of justice, in violation of 18 USC @ 1503, and did
c. conspire to deprive complainant of rights protected and guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of the United States, in violation of 18 USC @ 242.
d. conspire to interfere with complainant's civil rights in violation of 42 USC @ 1985(2)
e. conspire to interfere with complainant's civil rights in violation of 42 USC @ 1985(3)
f. having knowledge of a felony cognizable by a Court of the United States concealed and did not make same known to some Judge or other person in authority in violation of 18 USC @ 4.
45.Complainant contacted Assistant District Attorney, Frederica Jefferies of the Queens County District Attorney, on numerous occasions. Ms. Jefferies confirmed the scam's existence, however she informed complainant that the Queens County District Attorney was without jurisdiction, and complainant should file a civil action.
47.A complaint was filed with Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts. It was dismissed not because John Doe did not engage in criminal conduct, but because according to the Committee, it did not state a claim even though stating a claim is not a requirement.
48.The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, the Governing body of the Grievance Committee was notified. No action was taken.
49.Hon. Judith Kaye the Chief Judge of the Appellate Court of the State of New York, she was informed of the schemes.
50.She took no action, except to refer the matter to Hon. Fisher-Brandveen.
51.Hon. Fisher-Brandveen, claimed that the matter was thoroughly reviewed by Mr. Touhey the chief clerk of the Queens County Civil Court (housing), which did not happen.
52.Hon. George Pataki was informed of the schemes. He referred the matter to Hon. Jonathan Lippman of the Office of Court Administration.
53.The Office of Court Administration, acknowledged the scam's existence, however it was determined that because the proceedings are pending (due the schemes) it was without jurisdiction.
CAUSE OF ACTION
54.By reason of the facts set forth in paragraphs 33 through 53, today, through the failure of those responsible for the administration of Justice, to take corrective, and disciplinary action, and through their affirmative acts of support for criminals they have contributed to an aura of domination by criminal elements, and the Queens County Civil Court (housing) remains a captive enterprise at great public harm.
55.Today the schemes continue, the criminals are at large, and complainant's life is at risk.
RELIEF REQUESTED
56.Unless the relief prayed for is granted, these criminals will continue to rule, prohibited illegal acts and other prohibited illegal acts recently discontinued will recur at great public harm. Other criminals will not be deterred from engaging in similar criminal activity.
57.Wherefore, complainant requests:
a. application of the law to it's fullest extent.
b. assistance in retrieving complainant's food, clothing, and other property.
c. just and appropriate relief, as required by law.
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, and hereby give you all permission to make an inquiry into this matter.
Dated January 21, 2001.
......................................
Dorrel Holmes.
PO Box 300271
Jamaica N.Y. 11430